11:14, Tuesday 13 Feb., 2001
Link
You know I don't think the patent WO0029980 should be valid, because the first four claims are for things I've been doing with Dirk for about two years.
The patent is owned by Lazy Software for their associative model of data concept. I've got no complaints with the applications they build on this idea, but what if someone had patented relational databases and not let them go? It's a too low-level and too obvious a technique.
Interconnectedness: So I reckon I own prior art. What should I do?
Continue reading...
The 8 latest posts are named
irrecoverable, books read feb to apr 2011, finding baby sciences and new moons, fukushima and engineering, inbox hero, google and baidu, conviviality, and shape changing robot.
Read them.
Archives
2012
January.
2011
May, March, February, January.
2010
December, January.
2009
February.
2008
December, November, September, August, July, June, May, April, March, February, January.
2007
December, November, October, September, July, June, May, March, February, January.
2006
December, November, October, September, August, July, June, May, April, March, February, January.
2005
December, November, October, September, August, July, June, May, April, March, February, January.
2004
December, November, October, September, August, July, June, May, April.
2003
December, November, October, September, August, July, June, May, April, March, February, January.
2002
December, November, October, September, August, July, June, May, April, March, February, January.
2001
December, November, October, September, August, July, June, May, April, March, February, January.
2000
December, November, October, September, August, July, June, May, April, March, February.
Interconnected is copyright 2000—2011 Matt Webb.